Edusign

France's national quality framework: definition, 7 Qualiopi criteria and compliance for training providers

The Edusign team · 10 mars 2026 · 7 min
In brief: France's national quality framework (referentiel national qualite) is the regulatory framework that defines the 7 criteria and 32 indicators that every training provider must meet to obtain Qualiopi certification. Mandatory since 1 January 2022 to access public and pooled funding, it covers transparency of offerings, adaptation to learners, training monitoring and participant satisfaction. For quality leads and training organisation directors, mastering this framework is the essential condition for the institution's financial sustainability. It is broadly comparable to quality-management standards like ISO 9001 applied to the education sector.

The national quality framework: definition

France's national quality framework (RNQ, referentiel national qualite) is a set of criteria and indicators defined by decree, establishing the quality requirements applicable to providers of professional training activities in France. It is defined in Article L. 6316-1 of the French Labour Code and periodically revised by the Ministry of Labour in conjunction with France Competences (the national authority overseeing vocational training).

Concretely, this framework is the backbone of Qualiopi certification, the only state-recognised label that allows training organisations, apprenticeship centres (CFAs), prior learning validation bodies and skills assessment providers to access public funding. Without Qualiopi certification, a training provider cannot receive skills-operator funding (OPCO), individual training account (CPF equivalent) subsidies, or regional grants.

The framework applies to all types of providers: private training organisations, CFAs, prior learning validation bodies, skills assessment providers and business creation support providers. Each is audited according to the indicators relevant to their activity.

The 7 criteria of the national quality framework

The framework is structured around 7 criteria, broken down into 32 indicators. For training managers, here is what each criterion requires in practice:

  • Criterion 1: Public information conditions. The training provider must publish precise, up-to-date and accessible information about its programmes: objectives, modalities, duration, prices, funding options and expected results. This is the transparency of the offering.
  • Criterion 2: Identification of objectives and adaptation to target audiences. Each programme must have precise pedagogical objectives aligned with the identified needs of beneficiaries. An entry-level positioning assessment (prerequisite evaluation) is required.
  • Criterion 3: Adaptation of the provision to beneficiaries. The provider must demonstrate that it adapts its pedagogical, human and technical resources to learner needs identified during positioning. Resources used must be relevant and up to date.
  • Criterion 4: Adequacy of contributors. Trainers and contributors must have the competences required to deliver the training. The provider must document the qualifications, experience and professional development of its teams.
  • Criterion 5: Involvement of beneficiaries. The provider must collect and take into account learner feedback throughout the programme to adapt pedagogical progression. In-progress assessments are required.
  • Criterion 6: Execution monitoring. The provider must precisely trace training execution: attendance, progress, pedagogical exchanges. This is the criterion most directly linked to attendance sheets and documentary traceability.
  • Criterion 7: Satisfaction and effectiveness evaluation. The provider must measure learner and employer satisfaction, analyse results and use them to improve the offering. Satisfaction surveys are at the heart of this indicator.

Why Qualiopi certification is mandatory

Qualiopi certification has been mandatory since 1 January 2022 under the French vocational training reform of September 2018. This reform profoundly restructured the funding of professional training in France:

  • Skills operators (OPCO) can only fund training delivered by Qualiopi-certified providers.
  • Individual training accounts (CPF equivalent) are accessible only via the official platform, which requires certification.
  • Regional authorities, the state and the public employment service make their funding conditional on holding the label.

For a training organisation or apprenticeship centre that depends on these funding sources, the absence of Qualiopi certification means losing access to the vast majority of available funding. This is a question of commercial survival, not merely regulatory compliance.

How to obtain Qualiopi certification

Qualiopi certification is issued by certification bodies accredited by the COFRAC (French Accreditation Committee): AFNOR Certification, Bureau Veritas, LNE, SGS, and others. The procedure involves:

  • Step 1: Initial audit. An external auditor verifies the provider's compliance with the framework indicators through interviews, examination of documents (internal regulations, contracts, convocations, course materials, assessments) and verification of operational processes.
  • Step 2: Certification. If the provider is compliant, the certificate is issued for 3 years. Minor non-conformities lead to an action plan; major non-conformities prevent certification.
  • Step 3: Surveillance audit. An intermediate audit takes place between 14 and 18 months after initial certification to verify continued compliance.
  • Step 4: Renewal. At the 3-year mark, a renewal audit is required to maintain certification.

The cost of an initial audit generally ranges from 800 to 3,000 euros depending on the size of the organisation and the certification body. Internal preparation costs are often underestimated by teams that discover the framework late.

Maintaining and renewing certification

Obtaining certification is only the first step. The real challenge for quality leads is maintaining compliance over time, between audits. Key vigilance points:

  • Criterion 6 is the most time-consuming. Building execution evidence (attendance sheets, training records, learner outputs) on an ongoing basis is essential. Reconstructing this evidence after the fact is almost impossible and is detected immediately during audits.
  • Criterion 7 requires systematic monitoring. Sending satisfaction surveys after each training is not enough: results must be compiled, analysed and used to demonstrate a continuous improvement approach.
  • The framework evolves. France Competences can revise indicators between two certifications. Quality leads must monitor regulatory changes to anticipate new requirements.

Learning analytics play a growing role in demonstrating compliance with criteria 5 and 6: individual progression data, formative assessment results and completion rates constitute auditable evidence.

How Edusign facilitates compliance with the national quality framework

Edusign is designed to automate the production of documentary evidence required by the national quality framework, particularly for criteria 6 and 7:

  • Digital attendance signing: each training session automatically produces a timestamped attendance sheet, electronically signed by each learner, archived and exportable for audits. Criterion 6 covered without additional effort.
  • Automatic satisfaction surveys sent immediately after each session, with a results dashboard to feed the continuous improvement plan. Criterion 7 traceable and documented.
  • Electronic signature of training agreements, positioning documents and end-of-training certificates, ensuring every contractual document is legally archived without paper breaks.

For a quality lead at a training organisation or apprenticeship centre preparing for a quality certification audit, Edusign transforms time-consuming obligations into automatically generated evidence, reducing non-conformity risk on the criteria most closely checked by auditors.

Frequently asked questions about France's national quality framework

No, they are two related but distinct concepts. The national quality framework (RNQ) is the regulatory text that defines the 7 criteria and 32 quality indicators. Qualiopi is the certification mark issued by accredited certification bodies, attesting that a provider complies with this framework. In practice, when we speak of "Qualiopi certification", we refer to the complete process: compliance with the RNQ verified by a third-party audit.

The cost of an initial audit ranges from 800 to 3,000 euros depending on the size of the organisation and the certification body chosen. Some certification bodies offer reduced rates for very small providers (fewer than 5 employees). Certification is valid for 3 years, with a surveillance audit between 14 and 18 months after initial certification. Renewal costs are generally lower than those of the initial audit.

Yes. A certification body can withdraw certification in the event of serious non-compliance with the framework, a report from a funding body, or an unannounced inspection revealing major non-conformities. Triggering events can also open an audit: a learner complaint, a dispute with a funder, or a substantial change in the provider's activities. Compliance must therefore be maintained continuously, not only at planned audit times.

On average, organisations starting from scratch need 3 to 6 months of preparation for a first audit. This time includes: reading and understanding the framework, putting in place missing processes (entry positioning, satisfaction surveys, formalised attendance sheets), building a portfolio of evidence from recent training, and possibly drafting internal procedures. Providers that already use digital tools to manage their training generally have a significantly shorter preparation time.

A training provider without Qualiopi certification can continue to operate and sell training, but cannot access public or pooled funding: skills operators (OPCO), individual training accounts, regional grants, or contracts with public employment services. In practice, for most providers whose activity relies on these funding sources, operating without certification means losing the bulk of their revenue. There is no direct criminal sanction, but the loss of access to funding is a major economic penalty.

Ready to simplify your management?