{"id":12054,"date":"2024-03-17T14:50:12","date_gmt":"2024-03-17T14:50:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/edusign.com\/?p=12054"},"modified":"2024-02-22T09:47:37","modified_gmt":"2024-02-22T09:47:37","slug":"openai-has-launched-a-second-tool-to-complement-chatgpt-and-help-teachers-detect-cheating","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/edusign.com\/blog\/openai-has-launched-a-second-tool-to-complement-chatgpt-and-help-teachers-detect-cheating\/","title":{"rendered":"OpenAI has launched a second tool to complement ChatGPT – and help teachers detect cheating."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Since the arrival <\/strong>of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence-generated <\/strong>text tool, opinions have been mixed<\/strong>, particularly in the field of education<\/a><\/strong>. Capable of generating <\/strong>a variety of textual content<\/strong>, this tool <\/strong>can also be used for malicious <\/strong>purposes such as disinformation <\/strong>or cheating<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n OpenAI, the company <\/strong>behind the famous ChatGPT, has launched <\/strong>a tool capable of detecting whether a text has been written <\/strong>by an artificial intelligence <\/strong>(AI) or a human. This detector <\/strong>is capable of predicting <\/strong>with what probability <\/strong>a text, of at least 1,000 characters<\/strong>, has been imagined by AI rather <\/strong>than by a human being<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Once a text of at least 1000 characters <\/strong>has been entered into the tool, the software <\/strong>will label the document according <\/strong>to the probability that the AI has intervened<\/strong>. There are five levels of probability<\/strong>: very unlikely <\/strong>(10% chance), unlikely <\/strong>(between 10 and 45%), unclear <\/strong>(between 45 and 90%), maybe <\/strong>(between 90 and 98%), or probably <\/strong>(over 98%). OpenAI nevertheless <\/strong>estimates that 9% of texts are incorrectly considered <\/strong>to have been written by AI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But the company <\/strong>has warned users <\/strong>on its blog that the tool is not entirely <\/strong>reliable, and the creators want feedback <\/strong>on how their new tool works.<\/p>\n\n\n\nHow does it work?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
We’ve tested the tool for you:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n